This rebuttal is in response to this letter.
DAYTON, April 10. – In last weeks’ Free Trader I noticed a communication from Dayton signed “O. C.” purporting to give an explanation of a little difficulty which occurred at the church in West Serena. His informant has either stated a malicious falsehood or has undertaken to explain a matter without understanding the facts of the case.
In the first place, there is no such thing as a “union church” in West Serena, neither has any one ever contributed money to erect one, nor has any member of a Universalist church contributed money to build a church in West Serena to my knowledge. If there has, will your correspondent please give the names. It is true that the people generally contributed liberally to build a church, but it was certainly with an understanding that it was to be a Methodist church and there was no chance for deception with any one who read the subscription paper, nor were the men who signed the preamble and resolution demanding the use of the house for Mrs. Gibb deceived in the least, as their own resolution shows. Furthermore, their own lady minister requested them not to apply for the use of the church and announced her appointment for that day at the new schoolhouse in Dist. No. 1.
Secondly, our minister has not, on any public occasion, said one word against Mrs. Gibb to my knowledge. What was said publicly was by the presiding elder.
Thirdly, there has no christian denomination been refused the use of the house, nor will there be if it does not conflict with regular appointments. Fourthly, as regards these “conscientious swindlers” who deceived their neighbors when money was wanted to build a church, I may state that Mr. Hall was not a member of the board at the time the church was built; therefore no blame can attach to him. As regards the other two, we challenge your correspondent or any one to show that we used deception to raise money to build the church or made one promise that has not been faithfully kept. We do not deny that the promise was made that the church should be free to other orthodox denominations when not conflicting with the M. E. appointments and this promise will be kept. Had your correspondent read what wise men had said in sacred writ instead of Shakespeare, he would not have troubled you to publish such a slanderous article, nor would he have troubled those of your readers who love truth rather than slander, for Solomon says, “Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but they that deal truly are his delight.”
WM. A. GREENLEES.1
It’s not over yet – see next week for the final installment.
- Ottawa Free Trader, April 12, 1879, p. 8, col. 2






